Crimes Against Humanity - by the Central Intelligence Agency
Nanotechnology Based Bioterrorism
Project MKUltra was a program initiated by the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to explore various mind-control techniques, including the use of drugs and psychological manipulation. MKUltra had its roots in the early 1950s and officially began in 1953.
The project was officially authorized on April 13, 1953, by then-CIA Director Allen Dulles. Its objectives included developing methods to control and manipulate human behavior for intelligence and military purposes. MKUltra involved experiments on both willing and unwitting subjects, and its activities were wide-ranging, encompassing the use of drugs like LSD, hypnosis, sensory deprivation, and other methods.
Oversight
MKUltras existence was kept secret for many years, and details about the program only began to emerge in the 1970s. The program faced significant public and congressional scrutiny in the aftermath of revelations about its activities. The Church Committee, a U.S. Senate committee chaired by Senator Frank Church, conducted investigations in the mid-1970s and uncovered information about MKUltras controversial and often ethically questionable experiments.
Dodging the Bullet
In 1973, amid the growing controversy and public awareness, CIA Director Richard Helms ordered the destruction of most MKUltra documents, making it challenging to fully understand the extent of the programs activities. As a result, many details remain classified or were lost, contributing to the mystery and speculation surrounding Project MKUltra.
They Never Stop
With the advent of nanotechnology, mind control and altering technology has gone to the next level. Using next generation advanced miniscule nano devices that have been spread globally around the world. Peoples became victims of these irresponsible act. Raising practical legal, privacy and national security implication. With the ability to control and sense overall human bodily function, it raised the question. Whether this nanotechnology based wireless brain computer interface, will conclude the ultimate fate for humanity. Weapon of Mass Killing
Time to ACT
We will prosecute current and former central intelligence agency director that has been using this technology and stop them from ever using nano neurotechnology for intelligence collection and operations on global population. Unlawful nonconsentual release of nano technology implants on human bodies. The victim : Global Populations
We will pressure the United States government via United Nations bodies to put a stop on the nano neurotechnology (neurint) on going operations by the central intelligence agency.
It endangers and risk the whole world by letting the CIA operates these technology.
What is Crucial
These technologies, capable of manipulating cognition, behavior, and even emotional states, present challenges that transcend conventional definitions of warfare and biological agents. In response, there have been calls for new binding legal instruments or updates to existing treaties to explicitly prohibit the development, deployment, and use of neurotechnological tools for coercive or military purposes. Proposals such as the establishment of “NeuroRights” or inclusion of neurotechnology in arms control regimes reflect early steps toward safeguarding mental autonomy and preventing psychological manipulation in conflict and surveillance contexts.
At the state level, legal responses remain fragmented, with only a few jurisdictions beginning to engage seriously with the implications of military or coercive applications of neurotechnology. Some governments, particularly those funding neuroscience for defense purposes, have initiated internal reviews and ethical oversight mechanisms, but often lack transparency and robust regulation. Civil society organizations and academic institutions have pushed for national legislation to enshrine protections such as cognitive liberty, mental privacy, and psychological continuity, particularly in countries at the forefront of brain-computer interface (BCI) development. However, the absence of a unified international standard creates risks of regulatory gaps and geopolitical competition. To prevent an arms race in neuroweapons and ensure the protection of fundamental human rights, coordinated international legal development, supported by state-level implementation and oversight, is urgently needed.